Recently we’ve analyzed in Zurnal criminal investigation due to the non-implementation of verdict Sejdic-Finci. This time, we explain in discussion with political scientist Adnan Huskic where did it stuck in realization of this important verdict, which are main proposals and their issues and who is fault for non-implementation of verdict.
ZURNAL: Recently you said that there is a matrix of all negotiations and proposals about Sejdic-Finci case and that there won’t be solution. Which matrix do you see and why do you believe that there can’t be solution?
HUSKIC: Current situation, related to the implementation of Sejdic-Finci verdict, is a result of relation of powers in which parties from Republika Srpska are having unified attitude according to which they believe that implementation of decision should be performed only in the way that election of Presidium’s members is performed directly. That’s their request. Their attitudes are complementary to HDZ’s attitude, apropos request of Croatian parties who ask to get within the negotiations repetition of “case Komsic” (Zeljko Komsic, member of Presidium) practically enabled, more precisely, to be sure that one who is elected as Croatian member of Presidium be elected with Croatian votes.